<lexicon >
<entry >
<head >
<headword >
<lemma orthography_ids= "342" dynamic_accentuation_ids= "81|83" pronunciation_ids= "32" hyphenation_ids= "" tonemic_accentuation_ids= "85" > agencija</lemma>
</headword>
<lexicalUnit sloleksId= "LE_c77074df05d2719216d477bd01d418ad" sloleksKey= "S_megla" type= "single" >
<lexeme lexical_unit_lexeme_id= "83224" > megla</lexeme>
</lexicalUnit>
<grammar >
<category > samostalnik</category>
<grammarFeature name= "type" > common</grammarFeature>
<grammarFeature name= "gender" > feminine</grammarFeature>
<!-- grammarFeature name="pattern">Sz.1.2.o</grammarFeature -->
</grammar>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "Gigafida 2.0" > 285818</measure>
</measureList>
<relatedEntryList />
</head>
<body >
<wordFormList >
<wordForm id= "333330" >
<msd language= "sl" system= "JOS" > Sozdr</msd>
<msd language= "en" system= "UD" > AUX|...</msd>
<grammarFeatureList >
<grammarFeature name= "number" > dual</grammarFeature>
<grammarFeature name= "case" > genitive</grammarFeature>
</grammarFeatureList>
<formRepresentations >
<orthographyList >
<orthography id= "342" morphologyPatterns= "MP.1" status= "preferred" >
<form > megel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "Gigafida 2.0" > 813</measure>
<measure type= "frequency" source= "GOS 1.0" > 432</measure>
</measureList>
</orthography>
<orthography id= "343" morphologyPatterns= "cjvt:MP.2" >
<form > megla</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "Gigafida 2.0" > 9999</measure>
<measure type= "frequency" source= "GOS 1.0" > 888</measure>
</measureList>
</orthography>
</orthographyList>
<!-- Pri accentuantion in tonemic gre v resnici za dva načina naglaševanja, ali dovoljujemo potem povsem ločena elementa "tonemic" in "accentuation"? Če hočemo, da je vse pod "accentuation" in se razlikujeta po "type", potem je problem v glavi, kjer pri lemi navajamo npr. "accentuation_id", ki bi se potem moral pojaviti dvakrat? -->
<!-- Pri nekaterih vzorcih se stvari zelo ponavljajo; pri ZRC - ju npr. ločujejo meglA in mEgla -->
<accentuationList type= "dynamic" >
<accentuation id= "81" orthography_id= "342" stressPatterns= "cjvt:AP.1|zrc:S202b" status= "preferred" >
<form > mègel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
<accentuation id= "82" orthography_id= "343" stressPatterns= "AP.1" >
<form > meglá</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
<accentuation id= "83" orthography_id= "342" stressPatterns= "AP.2" status= "preferred" >
<form > mègel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
<accentuation id= "84" orthography_id= "343" stressPatterns= "AP.2" >
<form > meglá</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
</accentuationList>
<accentuationList type= "tonemic" >
<!-- tonemicPatterns je pri ZRC - ju v resnici združen z oblikoslovnim in naglasnim vzorcem, kar je mogoče problematično, saj bi ga v Sloleksu potem morali navesti tako pod orthography kot pod accentuation/tonemic. -->
<accentuation id= "85" orthography_id= "342" stressPatterns= "S202b|S202i" status= "preferred" >
<form > mȅgel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
<accentuation id= "86" orthography_id= "343" stressPatterns= "S202b" >
<form > meglā</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
<accentuation id= "87" orthography_id= "342" stressPatterns= "S202i" >
<form > mȅgel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
<accentuation id= "88" orthography_id= "343" stressPatterns= "S202i" >
<form > meglā</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</accentuation>
</accentuationList>
<pronunciationList >
<pronunciation id= "32" dynamic_accentuation_id= "81" tonemic_accentuation_id= "85" status= "preferred" >
<form script= "IPA" > mɛˈ ɡ </form>
<form script= "SAMPA" > mE"ɡ </form>
<measureList > <!-- Ali obstaja več measureListov, po eden za vsak form? Ali pa povezujemo vsak measure z ustreznim form? -->
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</pronunciation>
<pronunciation id= "33" dynamic_accentuation_id= "82" tonemic_accentuation_id= "86" >
<form script= "IPA" > mɛˈ ɡ </form>
<form script= "SAMPA" > mE"ɡ </form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</pronunciation>
<pronunciation id= "34" dynamic_accentuation_id= "82" norm= "non-standard" >
<form script= "IPA" > mɛˈ γ </form>
<form script= "SAMPA" > mE"γ </form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</pronunciation>
<pronunciation id= "35" dynamic_accentuation_id= "81" norm= "non-standard" >
<form script= "IPA" > mɛˈ γ </form>
<form script= "SAMPA" > mE"γ </form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</pronunciation>
</pronunciationList>
<hyphenationList >
<hyphenation id= "7" orthography_id= "342" >
<form > me|gel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</hyphenation>
<hyphenation id= "8" orthography_id= "81" >
<form > mè|gel</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</hyphenation>
<hyphenation id= "8" orthography_id= "82" >
<form > me|glá</form>
<measureList >
<measure type= "frequency" source= "XXX" > 7777</measure>
</measureList>
</hyphenation>
</hyphenationList>
</formRepresentations>
</wordForm>
</wordFormList>
</body>
</entry>
</lexicon>
